<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Testing for .NET Teams: WatiN or Watir?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardlawrence.info/2009/01/19/web-testing-for-net-teams-watin-or-watir/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardlawrence.info/2009/01/19/web-testing-for-net-teams-watin-or-watir/</link>
	<description>On making software teams happier and more productive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GettingAgile.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web Testing for .NET Teams: WatiN or Watir?</title>
		<link>http://www.richardlawrence.info/2009/01/19/web-testing-for-net-teams-watin-or-watir/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>GettingAgile.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web Testing for .NET Teams: WatiN or Watir?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardlawrence.info/?p=100#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] Richard Lawrence provides a comparison between WatiN and WatiR pros and cons in this article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Richard Lawrence provides a comparison between WatiN and WatiR pros and cons in this article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen van Menen</title>
		<link>http://www.richardlawrence.info/2009/01/19/web-testing-for-net-teams-watin-or-watir/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroen van Menen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardlawrence.info/?p=100#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I use and like WatiN, but maybe thats not such a surprise :-)
Thanks for the article. Always good to know where things can be improved.

Jeroen van Menen
Lead dev WatiN

btw I definitely also have love for watir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use and like WatiN, but maybe thats not such a surprise <img src='http://www.richardlawrence.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thanks for the article. Always good to know where things can be improved.</p>
<p>Jeroen van Menen<br />
Lead dev WatiN</p>
<p>btw I definitely also have love for watir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sai</title>
		<link>http://www.richardlawrence.info/2009/01/19/web-testing-for-net-teams-watin-or-watir/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Sai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardlawrence.info/?p=100#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Good post... Watir support for Chrome has come up now. Check out http://code.google.com/p/chrome-watir for more info...

One more advantage of watir which I found is because of Ruby building abstractions and DSLs for testing is pretty easy and good looking ;)

Regards,
Sai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post&#8230; Watir support for Chrome has come up now. Check out <a href="http://code.google.com/p/chrome-watir" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/chrome-watir</a> for more info&#8230;</p>
<p>One more advantage of watir which I found is because of Ruby building abstractions and DSLs for testing is pretty easy and good looking <img src='http://www.richardlawrence.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Sai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
